Facebook Home – Not a ‘Phone’, ‘an app’, about ‘People’

Not a ‘Phone’, ‘an app’, about ‘People’ – Big ambitions and an interesting start of really moving to a position where the ‘Device’ is a portal to consume ‘the service’ relevant to ‘the people’.  As long term follower of Mobility and Social media expansion this is one of the most ambitious moves Facebook will be making.

Vendor/Device neutral proposition designed to excell reach amongst consumers.

More Reach, More Yield and more Frequency.

Biggest test of all is whether Android see this as an opportunity or a threat. I suspect the later as Google Plus and other Google services will be in competition with Facebook. The game here is ADVERTISING and Consumer Intelligence. The challenge here is to what end will consumers give away privacy over colloboration. IS there a middle ground ?  In the business world yes – Microsoft O365.

Embedly Powered

Did you like this? Share it:

EU data watchdogs take aim at Google

google-privacy-eu

Europe’s largest data-protection authorities have laun
ched a joint action against Google to force it to remedy alleged breaches of EU privacy rules by the search giant.

The move by data-protection authorities from Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands is the first co-ordinated and formal procedure by EU states against a single company on privacy, underscoring European frustration with Google.

European watchdogs can currently impose only fines below €1m but new EU-wide rules could soon empower them to inflict on companies penalties up to 2 per cent of their global annual turnover.

In Google’s case that would add up to about $760m, based on its 2011 revenues. The new rules could be approved by the end of this year by EU lawmakers and member states.

The move comes five months after a probe led by CNIL, the French watchdog representing EU regulators, concluded that Google had failed to give users adequate information about how their personal data were being used across its multiple platforms.

Google responded that its privacy policy respected European law. “We have engaged fully with the data-protection authorities involved throughout this process, and we’ll continue to do so going forward,” it said in a statement.

The Mountain View-based group has faced intense criticism for its privacy policy since it first moved to merge customer data held across its various services such as Gmail and YouTube, which alone holds the data of more than 1bn users.

High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2b40d8ba-9bae-11e2-a820-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz2PWZm0BpW

The US group said its new privacy terms, which combine 60 former policies into one for all its customers, would allow it to provide a better service. Google Now, which provides intuitive updates based on calendar entries, location patterns and emails, is one example of a service making use of the new approach.

“It is good to see that six national data-protection authorities are teaming up to enforce Europe’s common data-protection rules,” said Viviane Reding, EU commissioner for justice. “I am confident that the European Parliament and the EU member states will strengthen Europe’s enforcement tools substantially in the course of this year.”

EU privacy officials have also criticised aggressive US lobbying on behalf of Google and Facebook to relax new privacy laws being considered by Brussels.

The news comes a day after Google confirmed that its privacy director, Alma Whitten, was leaving after nearly three years in the role.

Ms Whitten was appointed in 2010 after Google admitted that its Street View cars had been recording data from the unprotected WiFi networks of homeowners, for which it paid CNIL a €100,000 fine. Lawrence You, a member of Google’s privacy team, will take over the role.

Google said the move was unrelated to actions by the EU regulators.

The company is also fighting EU competition authorities over the prominence of its own products in Google search results.

Last week Microsoft published, through a consultant, findings of a survey showing that Google’s competitors were being disadvantaged by sitting lower in search results than Google’s own services in areas like shopping and travel. On March 21 2011, complainants in that investigation published an open letter to, Joaquín Almunia, EU vice-president, urging him to take action.

Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch, a UK privacy campaigner, said: “Google has repeatedly put profit ahead of user privacy . . . It is essential regulators find a sanction that is not just a slap on the wrists and will make Google think twice before it ignores consumer rights again.”

 

By James Fontanella-Khan in Brussels and Bede McCarthy in London

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2b40d8ba-9bae-11e2-a820-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2PWVs5rZU

Did you like this? Share it:

Revealed, Monitoring charter will cost UK £2bn: Huge price of plan to let state spy on websites, emails and texts

  • Britain’s snooping watchdog reveals grave doubts over the mass  surveillance project
  • Internal documents say plans could lead to innocents being wrongly identified as criminals
  • Project has sparked huge row at Westminster, dividing the Coalition

Big Brother plans to spy on all internet visits, emails and texts will cost the taxpayer £2billion.

The extraordinary bill was revealed amid revelations that Britain’s snooping watchdog has grave doubts about the mass surveillance project.

The Office of the Information Commissioner said the case had ‘not been made’ to justify the sweeping expansion in the power of the police and other public bodies to trawl through private communications, including visits to Facebook and eBay.

Internal ICO papers, marked restricted, say the Orwellian plan could lead to the innocent being wrongly identified as criminals or terrorists and barred from flying.

Grave doubts: The mass surveillance project has sparked fears that it could lead to the innocent being wrongly identified as criminals or terroristsGrave doubts: The mass surveillance project has sparked fears that it could lead to the innocent being wrongly identified as criminals or terrorists

WHAT THE CHANGES WILL MEAN TO YOU

Many of us have several devices to communicate with others. Here, we explain how the new system will affect them:

Under surveillance: In future, every website visit via your iPad or laptop would be kept for a fixed period by your internet service providerUnder surveillance: In future, every website visit via your iPad or laptop would be kept for a fixed period by your internet service provider

LANDLINE

No change. Police, the security services and other public bodies can already access data on who you are calling and when, but not the details of what was said. This information is stored by phone companies, but a ministerial warrant is required to access it.

MOBILE PHONE

Officials can already find out who you have called or texted and when, and even pinpoint your location. The law does not currently cover modern ways of communicating, such as BlackBerrys. In future, those platforms would be tracked too.

LAPTOP/IPAD

Some basic data is currently stored, such as when a person started browsing the web. In future, every website visit would be kept for a fixed period by your internet service provider. This would only detail the address of the website, and not the exact content.

EMAIL

No change. Officials can already see who you email, and when. If there is a suspicion of wrongdoing, police and security services can access your correspondence under a warrant.

SKYPE

Terrorists have turned to Skype, as existing laws do not cover internet telephone calls. Security officials say this loophole must be closed. If their demands are met, they would be able to check who you call and when.

FACEBOOK

As with web browsing, social networking data is not routinely stored. New rules would give the authorities the right to know who you have been talking to on Facebook, and when.

GAMES CONSOLE

Security services suspect online gaming – which allows players to chat using headsets or text messages – could be used to plot terrorist activity. In future, data would be stored on who gamers play with or talk to.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2124251/Government-spy-websites-emails-texts-cost-taxpayers-2bn.html#ixzz1qvbSL3FL

Background reading :

EU: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Tackling Crime in our Digital Age: Establishing a European Cybercrime Centre (pdf) press release(link). The centre will be established within the European Police Office, Europol in The Hague (The Netherlands). The centre will be the European focal point in fighting cybercrime and will focus on illegal online activities carried out by organised crime groups, particularly those generating large criminal profits, such as online fraud involving credit cards and bank credentials. from : http://www.statewatch.org/

NETWORK NEUTRALITY 101: Why The Government Must Act To Preserve The Free And Open Internet (2010 resource): The Internet has become a deeply ingrained in the lives of most Americans. It looms so large, in fact, it is easy to imagine that it is immune to change — that it will always remain the free and open medium that it is now. But there are no such guarantees.

Online Free Speech (2006 resource): In a clear victory for free speech, the Supreme Court has announced that it will not hear the government’s appeal of a ban on the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), the federal law that would criminalize constitutionally protected speech on the Internet.

Online Censorship in the States (2002 resource): In a sweeping victory for free speech rights in cyberspace, the Supreme Court struck down the Communications Decency Act in Reno v. ACLU in June 1997. The Court granted the highest level of First Amendment protection to the Internet, and cyber-activists are still dancing in the streets. Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, states are busy crafting censorship laws at home.

Did you like this? Share it: